TMI Blog2004 (5) TMI 421X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ) - A/930/2004-NB(SM) - Dated:- 31-5-2004 - Shri P.S. Bajaj, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri S.K. Bansal, CA, for the Appellant. Shri Randhir Singh, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. Hea ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d 38.23 of the CETA do not stand covered under the definition of capital goods in terms of Rule 57Q. I do not prima facie find any illegality in the impugned order. Therefore, on merits, appellants ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|