2004 (5) TMI 444

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hary, JCDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - The appellants have filed the applications seeking condonation of delay of 116 days. The appellants are represented by Shri B.L. Sanjeev, who is absent today. On the last date of hearing i.e., on 10-5-2004, the Counsel and the parties were present and today's date was fixed in their presence. They have signed the order she .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rnment, preparing the appeal memorandum, getting the sanctions for paying the fee and to get the verification signed. They stated that out of the above period the limitation period is 90 days and the delay caused is 116 days. The affidavits have blamed the State Government for the delay in giving the permission. After due consideration of the affidavit, we are of the considered opinion that appell .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X