2004 (8) TMI 488

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Chacko, Member (J) (Oral)]. This matter does not figure in today s list. On 17-8-2004, the appellants had moved an application before us for extension of stay of recovery, but we did not grant the prayer, observing that the department had not issued any demand notice. Ld. Counsel for the appellants mentions today that a demand notice has since been received. She files a copy of the letter .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Ld. DR also and considered his submissions. 2. A Larger Bench of this Tribunal, in the case IPCL v. CCE, Vadodara [2004 (169) E.L.T. 267 (T - LB) = 2004 (63) RLT 1 (Tri. LB)], has held that the Tribunal has inherent jurisdiction to extend the stay of recovery during the pendency of appeal. 3. In dealing with the instant matter, we note that the above letter of the Deputy Commissioner is an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X