9911796707
TMI Blog2004 (12) TMI 455X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. These 04 (four) appeals are against the Orders-in-Appeal No. 537/2002 dated 19-9-2002 and No. 589/2002 dated 1-10-2002 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise Customs (Appeals), Bangalore. 2. The appellants availed CENVAT credit under Rule 57A on certain inputs. The notices were sent to the job worker under Rule 57F(4) by debiting 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... llants have been visited with huge penalty. The order of the Original Authority has been confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). Aggrieved over the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), the appellants have come before this Bench. 3. Shri S. Prakash, Manager (Fin.) appeared on behalf of the appellants Shri L. Narasimha Murthy, learned SDR appeared on behalf of the Department. 4. We have consi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... job worker, he actually availed the duty paid by the job worker on the returned goods. The Revenue has to keep in mind the fact that when the appellants availed credit, the amount availed as credit has gone to the exchequer earlier because the job worker paid the duty on the goods manufactured by him using the inputs received from the appellant. The duty paid by the job worker is at a value which ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... orporation v. Collector of Central Excise, Kochi - 1996 (84) E.L.T. 44 (Tribunal), the Tribunal has held that the Modvat credit should be allowed as per the amount of duty indicated in the duty paying documents and the fact that the duty is short paid or excess paid is not relevant for factory. In the case of Facit Asia Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise -1991 (54) E.L.T. 347 (Madras - CEGAT), th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
