2005 (2) TMI 568

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. Shri Bipin Garg, learned Advocate submitted that the Tribunal has directed M/s. Delite Processors vide Stay Order No. 562/2004-B to deposit a sum of Rs. 2.5 lakhs; that as they had deposited only Rs. 50,000/- within the time given by the Tribunal, the same was extended by another four weeks on the request made by the Applicants .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... artmental Representative has rightly submitted that the last extension was granted to the Applicants on their request for complying with the direction contained in the Stay Order. It is not open to them to come up now for modification of the Stay Order. We do not find any merit in the application which is rejected. As the Applicants have not complied with the Stay Order passed by the Tribunal, we .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X