2005 (3) TMI 646

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. These are two applications by M/s. Prem Heavy Engineering Works P. Ltd. for condonation of delay in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. 2.We heard Shri R.R. Rishi, learned Advocate and Shri H.C. Verma, learned DR. 3.The impugned Order No. 51-52/04, dated 19-2-2004 was despatched to the applicants on 19-2-2004 i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ral cause and circumstances. 4.Opposing the prayer, Shri H.C. Verma, learned DR submitted that the impugned order was duly sent by registered post to the known address of the applicants; that they had not taken care to intimate their new address to the Commissioner (Appeals) before whom they had filed the appeals; that thus they have been negligent in pursuing their matters and the delay of alm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... order was passed on 6-2-2004. The applicants should have been careful as their appeals had been heard and the order was to be passed. We, therefore, find that the applicants have not satisfactorily explained the delay in filing the appeals. We, therefore, dismiss their applications for condonation of delay. Consequently, both the appeals are also dismissed. (Operative part of the order announce .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X