2005 (5) TMI 574

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... urthy, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. This appeal challenges the imposition of fine of Rs. 3.5 lakhs and penalty of Rs. 1.75 lakhs. The appellant had misdeclared the goods in the bill of entry. On examination it was found that they were used in parts of computers imported in violation of para 217 of Exim Policy. The appellants do not contest the as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rendered in the case of Mudra Offset v. CC, Bangalore [2004 (175) E.L.T. 470] wherein for violation of conditions of policy by importer, the Tribunal has held that goods are liable for confiscation and for imposition of redemption fine and penalty. 2. On a careful consideration, I notice that original authority has cleared the importer of the charge of mala fide intention to evade duty in the ma .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X