2005 (10) TMI 461

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... an and Bharat Raichandani, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. Heard both sides. It has been brought to our notice by both sides that there is a direction contained in the Hon ble Bombay High Court s order dated 28th September, 2005 to dispose off the stay application filed by Revenue within a period of three weeks. 2. Shri R.B. Pardeshi, le .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... advocate cites the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Guntur v. Ferro Alloys Corporation Limited, 1986 (26) E.L.T. 750 (Tribunal) and states that this is not a fit case for granting stay of the Tribunal order. He also states that the impugned amount was deposited by the respondent as per the direction of the Hon ble Supreme Court and after the final order by the T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X