2005 (12) TMI 468

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of cotton yarn. During the period 1 December 2001 to 11 January 2002, they removed single yarn on payment of duty under their invoices to their job workers for conversion into double yarn. The doubled yarn received from the job workers were further processed and cleared by them on payment of duty. The despatch of doubled yarn to the appellants factor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... om the job workers were not valid documents for Cenvat Credit purpose. Identical question had arisen before this Bench in Appeal No. E/1101/2004 (M/s. Madhava Lakshmi Mills Ltd. v. CCE, Coimbatore) and the same was decided in favour of the assessee. Para 2 of the final order passed by this Bench in the said appeal is reproduced below : After hearing both sides and considering their submissions .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on yarn (single). The doubled yarn was removed by the job workers to the appellants factory under cover of these invoices coupled with their own delivery challans. The doubled yarn so received by the appellants was an intermediate product, which was further processed into the final product in their factory and cleared on payment of duty. The appellants were very much within their right to take Ce .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X