2006 (5) TMI 407

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri Ramaswamy, Consultant, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Both these appeals are by the department. Officers of Central Excise had detected shortages of Modvat credit availed inputs in the respondents' premises upon physical stock verification and scrutiny of records. In respect of Shri Vivekananda Industries, a total shortage of 100.225 M.Ts. of raw material was found, out of which 8.400 M.Ts .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ad, by then, paid up the amounts of duty by way of debit in Cenvat Credit account, the show-cause notices proposed to appropriate the amounts towards the above demands. The notices also proposed penalties on the party under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, besides demanding interest on duty under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act. In the orders, of adjudication, the original authority con .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... proceedings were vitiated by the said findings and granted the benefit of doubt to the assessees. Accordingly, in respect of Shri Venkateswara Industries, ld. Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the entire demand of duty along with the demand of interest thereon. In respect of Shri Vivekananda Industries, he set aside the demand of duty on 91.825 M.Ts. of inputs and sustained demand of duty in respe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by both sides, I find that there is no good reason to interfere with the decision of the lower appellate authority insofar as the department's allegation of clandestine removal of inputs by the respondents is concerned. By granting the benefit of doubt to the parties, the original authority itself had ruled out clandestine removal but the department did not choose to challenge the finding of that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... also cannot be allowed. Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) appears to have imposed only reasonable penalty on each of the respondents under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules for improper maintenance of accounts. The case law cited by ld. SDR is inapplicable to the facts of these cases. 4. In the result, both the appeals are dismissed. (Order dictated and pronounced in open court)
Case laws, D .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X