2006 (5) TMI 410

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... asad, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard both sides. 2. Shri Vishal Agarwal, ld. Chartered Accountant, appearing for the appellants states that the appellants received the material from the principal manufacturer for job work and returned the same without payment of duty following the procedure under Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001 prescribed for such job work. The ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed to the credit. 4. Shri S.N. Prasad, ld. SDR points out from the impugned Order-in-Appeal the observations of the Commissioner (Appeals) to the effect that the appellants had only challenged the penalty and not the duty and interest. Shri Agarwal the ld. CA shows from the grounds of appeal, para 4, that the appellants had indeed sought relief in regard to credit reversed and interest amoun .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X