2006 (10) TMI 285

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on, for the Appellant. Shri K. Sambi Reddi, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. These ROM applications pertain to different Final Orders and they are taken up together for the disposal as the same are not maintainable in law. 2. In the case of M/s. Deprecon Engineering Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal disposed of the appeals by Final Order No. 817- 831/2005, date .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ndia Ltd. v. Collector of Customs reported in 1993 (68) E.L.T. 479 (Tribunal). This Larger Bench judgment has been followed by the Tribunal s Chennai Bench in the case of Kumar Power Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad [2001 (138) E.L.T. 212 (Tri. - Chennai)]. The learned Counsel further submits that the Final Order has already been appealed before the Apex Court and in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not sustainable and the same is rejected. 5. In the case of C.C., Mangalore v. Sanjeev Singh Chadda, the appeal was allowed by the Final Order No. 1035/2005, dated 1-7-2005. Being aggrieved with this order, the Revenue moved a ROM application which was rejected by the Misc. Order No. 194/2006 dated 30-1-2006. The present ROM application is against the facts which are identical in the above ROM a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X