The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be ...

Non-speaking order on ITC mismatch and GST return discrepancies set aside, remanded for fresh hearing.

Case Laws GST

October 30, 2024

The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be violative of principles of natural justice as it was a non-speaking order that failed to address the objections raised by the petitioner. The issues involved input tax credit mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-5, and discrepancies between GSTR-1 and e-way bill outward supplies. The impugned order was set aside, and the authority was directed to consider the petitioner's objections, provide an opportunity for personal hearing, and pass a speaking order within twelve weeks, in accordance with law. The petition was disposed of by way of remand.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be ...

Non-speaking order on ITC mismatch and GST return discrepancies set aside, remanded for fresh hearing.

Case Laws GST

October 30, 2024

You may also like:

Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

Validity of order in original and Demand of GST - These issues included discrepancies in GST returns, imposition of cess, treatment of scrips, and taxation of corporate...

The court held that the impugned order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner...

Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

Violation of principles of natural justice occurred as petitioner's contentions were not considered - mismatch between petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and auto-populated...

Petitioner challenged impugned order regarding GST discrepancies, failing to avail opportunity of personal hearing. Court held that notice was issued by respondent based...

Levy of Penalty u/s 73 - non willful mis-statement - discrepancies found on the returns - Validity of notice uploaded in the common portal and not communicated...

Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of...

Rectification petition - Validity Of Order passed - discrepancy between the GSTR 3B return - The petitioner contended that the discrepancy arose due to the belated...

Judicial review of an assessment order was conducted due to discrepancies between GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns. The petitioner's replies were not considered, violating...

The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the...

In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis....

Non-application of mind by respondent and violation of principles of natural justice. Petitioner unable to file immediate reply due to authorized person's illness....

The Allahabad High Court addressed the denial of a personal hearing in a tax assessment case, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such hearings u/s 75(4) of the U.P. GST...

The ITAT held that the disallowance of exemption claimed u/s 10(23C)(vi) due to a clerical error in the income tax return was improper. The order u/s 154 by CPC violated...

Quick Updates: