2007 (2) TMI 403

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Shri Anil Kumar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - Both the stay applications pertain to the same party. Hence they are taken up together for hearing. E/St/775/06 in E/1103/06 2. The appellant is required to pre-deposit Rs 4,12,480/-. They had cleared the goods in the domestic market on payment of additional duty of Customs in terms of Notification .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ort compliance on 16-5-07. E/St/776/06 in E/1104/06 5. The appellant is required to pre-deposit Rs. 12,236 in stay application No. 776/06 arising from Appeal No. 1104/06. The appellants have been denied the benefit of Notification No. 126/94 in respect of iron safe. The appellants contend that iron safe is needed for safe keeping of diamonds and it has to be considered as capital goods. Both t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X