2007 (2) TMI 477

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... der]. The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are that the respondents are manufacturer of man made knitted fabrics. On 19-2-2003, the Central Excise Officers visited the factory of the respondents. During the verification of stock, the said officers detected the excess stock. Shri Rajesh Jain, partner of the respondent could not explain the reason for excess stock as he had not been comin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the impugned order. 3. After hearing both sides and on perusal of the record, I find that the respondent submitted evidence in support of their contention that the fabrics in question were sent to the respondent for washing and stain removing. It is pertinent to note that the Revenue did not dispute the evidence placed by the respondent. Therefore, I do not find any reason to interfere with .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X