2007 (3) TMI 551

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... P.K. Das, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. Shri Debashis Ghosh, Authorised Representative, appearing for the appellants, states that the appellants paid duty on the impugned goods, namely, printed polyester pouches for a while and thereafter, by pure oversight, duty has not been paid during the impugned period. He further states .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case of genuine mistake. We also note that the duties have been promptly paid off, in fact, an amount of Rs. 15,69,200/- has been paid against duty demand of Rs. 10,05,007/-. We also take note of the fact that whatever benefit has accrued by delayed payment, stands neutralized by the liability to pay interest on the said amount. In view of the fact that we are satisfied that this is a case which .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X