9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (5) TMI 412X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Jain and Vikas Nanda, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri V.K. Agarwal, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.K. Abichandani, President]. By this application, the applicant prayed for rectifying the order dated 26-2-2007 on the ground that, the learned counsel, who had appeared in the matter, was not authorised to give an undertaking to make the deposit of Rs. 30 lacs. It was ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ned counsel appearing for the applicant, had stated that, a sum of Rs. 30 lacs (in addition to already deposited Rs. 20 lacs) could be deposited, if waiver of rest of the duty and penalty was ordered against them. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it was directed that the applicant will deposit Rs. 30 lacs over and above Rs. 20 lacs within six weeks. Other directions of pre-depo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... which discussions had already been held with him in his office before the hearing. It is also stated that, this application was moved without his consent and without his knowledge through some other Advocate who had not taken his No Objection . It is further stated in the affidavit that, stringent and deterrent measures were required to be taken against the counsel who moved this application wit ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... es no rectification. The present application is, therefore, rejected. This is being done without prejudice to any action that may be initiated against the applicant for making a wrong statement. 5. A copy of this order is forwarded to the President, Bar Council of Delhi, 2/6 Institutional Area, Sirifort Road, New Delhi - 110 016, along with a copy of Vakalatnamas of Shri Pradeep Jain, Advocate a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
