2007 (12) TMI 348

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dent. [Order]. Heard both sides. 2. The appellants filed this appeal against the impugned order whereby remission application filed by the appellants was rejected. The contention of the appellants is that the remission is in respect of goods destroyed in fire. 3. Learned SDR submitted that the Commissioner of Central Excise gave finding that the appellants had received compensation f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X