2008 (6) TMI 485

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri S.B. Shinde, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. Heard both sides. The impugned orders passed by the Authorities below are being challenged by the Appellants on the ground that the annual capacity of production was re-fixed by the Commissioner which was conveyed under Department s letter dated 14-6-1999 and 3-8-1999 without formally reviewi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ect to by the impugned orders passed by the Authorities below. Moreover, as indicated above, such fixation is also in accordance with law considering that the Appellants produce non-alloy steel to the extent of 70% of the total production. 2. Consequently, we find no merit in this Appeal. Accordingly the duty demand and interest on the duty are required to be paid by the Appellants in accordance .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X