2008 (4) TMI 644

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r per : B.S.V. Murthy, Member (T)]. - This appeal has been filed against the order holding that Cenvat credit of Rs. 28,40,122/- taken on capital goods viz. Moulds and Dies during May, 2003 and April, 2004 is not admissible. These moulds and dies were imported by M/s. Hindustan Lever Limited (HLL) and were sent to the appellants for manufacturing tooth brushes for M/s. HLL after proper endorse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . We find that the judgment of the Tribunal in CCE, Pune-I v. Kalyani Seamless Tubes Ltd. [2004 (176) E.L.T. 899 (Tri. Mumbai)] is applicable to the present case and by no stretch of imagination Rule 4(3) can be interpreted the way the Revenue has sought to do the same. Regarding endorsement of bill of entry also, issue stands covered by the decision of the Tribunal in Urastan Metal Industries Pvt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X