2008 (7) TMI 783

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er : M. Veeraiyan, Member (T)]. Heard both sides on the stay petition. 2. The applicant is manufacturing and clearing unbranded goods availing exemption under Notification No. 8/2003, dated 1-3-2003; they also manufacture the same specified goods with the brand name of others and cleared them on payment of duty. In as much as they were clearing the branded goods on payment of duty they hav .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... reported in 2007 (215) E.L.T. 448 (Tri. - Ahmd.). 5. We have carefully considered the submissions from both sides. We are of the prima facie view that in view of the change in the wordings of the notification No. 8/2003, the decision in the case of Ramesh Foods Products (supra) rendered in the context of 175/86 may not be applicable to the present facts of the case. The case of Saurashtra Export .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X