Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2008 (9) TMI 770

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order per : P. Karthikeyan, Member (T)]. M/s. Global Networking Enterprises (GNE) and Shri S. Suresh, proprietor of M/s. Asian Shipping Services have filed these appeals challenging the impugned order which confiscated an export consignment and imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- on Shri Suresh. When the appeal of Shri Suresh was called no one appeared representing him nor was there any req .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... been in the business of export of crabs to Singapore, garments and turmeric to Malasysia and garments to Colombo in the name of his firm Tirumala Traders. In 2001 he had started GNE in the name of one Shri Kaviarasu. GNE exported several consignments of garments to Colombo. He had exported consignments of automobile gaskets of M/s. Gabon Trading Co. and M/s. Gambier Traders in September, 2001. He .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... irumala traders. As the description and value of the export goods had been deliberately misdeclared in a drawback Shipping Bill, the Commissioner confiscated the 12500 pieces of gaskets entered for export under Section 113 (i) and (ii) of the Customs Act, 1962. She also imposed the impugned penalty of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on Shri Suresh. The confiscated goods wer .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Counsel did not press the challenge to the confiscation raised in the appeal. He prays for leniency as regards fine on GNE. 4. The ld. JDR submits that the appeal filed by GNE against the order of confiscation and redemption fine of Rs. 20,000/- did not advance any worthwhile ground. The impugned order deserved to be sustained as Shri Suresh was found to have been the person behind the attempt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... esh has been retracted. Therefore, these statements were admissible evidence in adjudicating the offence. The Commissioner had confiscated the consignment of 12500 pieces of gaskets for misdeclaration of value and description under Section 113(i) and (ii) of the Customs Act. We find that the Commissioner s order is passed on reliable evidence. We do not find any reason to interfere with the same. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates