2008 (11) TMI 506

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri D.S. Negi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. All the four appeals are being disposed off by a common order as they arise out of the same impugned order passed by Commissioner vide which penalties stand imposed upon the appellants in terms of provisions of Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. 2. As per facts on record, one M/s. Goyal Synthetics P .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for non-compliance with the directions as contained in the stay order. 4. We have gone through the impugned order of Commissioner as also we have seen statements made by proprietors of the said buyer units. We have also seen the statement of M/s. Goyal Synthetics representative. There is nothing in the said statement to reflect upon the involvement of the buyer units. As such, the conclusion a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X