2008 (7) TMI 826

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ondent. [Order]. This appeal has been filed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) No. Commr. (A)/10/VDR-II/2008, dt. 18-1-08, disallowing Cenvat credit of Rs. 84,576/- and imposing penalty of Rs. 10,000/- with appropriate interest on the credit payable. Cenvat credit has been rejected only on two grounds viz. the appellant had produced only a photocopy of the invoice and no prop .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the law as they existed earlier and learned advocate could not show that the rules are pari materia, even though such claim was made. I am inclined to accept the view that the letter from Supdtt. does not amount to a speaking order and therefore by not filing appeal against the letter, appellants have lost the right to claim admissibility of the Cenvat credit. The fact remains that under the pres .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X