TMI Blog2009 (3) TMI 704X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e, for the Respondent. [Order]. None present for the Respondent in Appeal Case No. 400/07 and 404/07 when that was called. Ld. Counsel Shri Rajesh Chibber appeared in Appeal case No. E/828-829/07. All these are filed by Revenue. 2. Ld. DR Shri S.K. Bhaskar appearing for Appeal Case No. 400/07 and Shri R.K. Verma, ld. DR appearing for Appeal case No. 404/07 and Appeal case No. 828-829/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the Committee to come to a conclusion that the order appealable is neither legal nor proper. A ready-made typed note was made available to him for his signature. The note when perused gives an impression that somebody has suggested him to take decision for filing the appeal. This is clear when the sentence reading In all such cases, we are now filing appeals before the CESTAT in view of the m ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 4-12-08 by order No. 66/09-SM(BR) in the case of CCE v. M/s. Kurele Chemicals Co. Another instance also before the Bench was on 9-1-09 that is the case in Appeal No. 1844/06-SM (BR) in the case of CCE v. M/s. LML Ltd. Similar such matters were also before the Bench in Appeal Case Nos. 53-54/07-SM(BR) disposed on 24-12-08 and Appeal Case No. 1894/06-SM(BR) disposed on 23-1-09. To maintain the consi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|