2006 (12) TMI 443

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... R.S. Dinker, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal dated 5-3-2001 which set aside the Order-in-Original that confirmed the demand and imposed penalty. 2. The issue involved in this case is regarding applicability of Notification No. 339/86 to the respondent s product Infusion set . It is the contention of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ailed and does not require to be interfered. 5. Considered the submissions made by both sides and perused the record. The dispute regarding eligibility of notification No. 339/86 has been clearly brought by the Commissioner (Appeals) in his Order-in-Appeal which reads as under :- I find that in this case, the CEGAT has remanded the case back only to consider the evidence relating to the use o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hat at present also the appellants have produced the certificate from Beach Candy Hospital and Research Centre, Bombay; Dr. Pardiwala s Nursing Home, Bombay and from Dr. V.K. Desai, Mumbai that the IV sets manufactured by the appellants are also known as infusion sets and these are used for giving intravenous fluid and other parenteral drugs. These are used over a long period of time in the indoor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X