Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1960 (11) TMI 98

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ferred a revision application before the Commissioner, Excise and Taxation, Rajasthan. That officer also rejected the assessee's claim on the ground that the term "cloth" is not a word of art and Durries are not included in the Notification No. F. 21(7)/SR/55 dated 14th April, 1955. On an application by the assessee that the Durries woven on handloom stood covered by the exemption certificate granted under the Notification relating to handloom cloth, the Commissioner has submitted the following question for answer: "Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case the turnover of Durries has been rightly included in the taxable turnover?" We have heard Shri Hastimal, learned counsel for the assessee, and Shri Kan Singh, Government Ad .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... king Durry or other handloom cloth being identical, Durry is a handloom cloth intended for covering the floor, stairs etc., and, therefore, stands exempted. The learned counsel urged that the Commissioner adopted the dictionary meaning of the word "cloth" but stopped short by not giving full effect to the word "covering". The learned counsel further argued that even assuming that the expression handloom cloth was capable of more than one meaning in a fiscal statute that interpretation should be given which is favourable to the subject. He relied on State of Bombay v. R.S. Phadtare[1956] 7 S.T.C. 495; A.I.R. 1956 Bom. 496., wherein it was held that sugarcane is a fresh vegetable which is exempted from the provisions of the Act. The learned J .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... which exemption is claimed are also manufactured by the same process as any other handloom cloth. Therefore, the word that requires closer examination is "cloth" and the significance of the clauses which follow it. The golden rule is that the words of a statute must Prima facie be given their ordinary meaning. In R. v. Peters[1886] 16 Q.B.D. 636 (641)., said Lord Coleridge: "I am quite aware that dictionaries are not to be taken as authoritative exponents of the meanings of the words used in Acts of Parliament, but it is a well known rule of courts of law that words should be taken to be used in their ordinary sense, and we are therefore, sent for instruction to these books." Now the word "cloth" has been understood by the following Lexi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y" as it covers a floor or a stair-case while the department resists such a wide application. It is, therefore, clear that if we give cloth and covering their generic import, "Durry" would appear to be included in the term. On the contrary, if a narrower interpretation is put, "Durry" would appear to be excluded. The learned counsel for the assessee invoked the aid of the doctrine that it is a fiscal matter and the beneficial construction should be put. We are unable to agree. As we have already noticed the item which we are called upon to interpret is an exemption pursuant to the provisions of section 4(2) of the Act. Section 3 is the charging section and it is in those cases alone where public interest demands that the State Government .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ord "include" is very generally used in interpretation clauses to enlarge the meaning of the words or phrases. The need for this enlargement in the instant case gives us a clue to the author's intention, namely, that he used the word "cloth" in its narrower sense, and with a view to enlarge its denotation he was impelled to have recourse to the usual method of "including". The learned counsel for the assessee suggested that he did so because embroidery work in a handloom pagri would have been otherwise outside the pale of handloom cloth. We are unable to accept the suggestion for the simple reason that pagri has been included both with and without challa. In our opinion, therefore, item 3 of the Notification of 14th April, 1955, when it e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates