2009 (8) TMI 956

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... JDR, for the Respondent. ORDER Vide the impugned order, the Commissioner has demanded service tax of Rs. 37,57,740/- along with applicable interest from the appellants towards the services rendered by them on 'erection, commissioning and installation' during the period from 16-6-2005 to 31-3-2007. There are also penalties imposed under various sections including an amount of Rs. 37,57,740/- und .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ration taken by them under Karnataka VAT Act, 2003 and also the assessment of the appellants for VAT under 'works contract' for various years. It is submitted that the assessment also covered the impugned activity. Since the works contract was brought under tax net for the first time on 1-6-2007 and the material period ends by 31-3-2007, it is argued that the impugned demand and penalties are not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X