Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2009 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (8) TMI 956 - AT - Service Tax

Issues:
Service tax demand for 'erection, commissioning, and installation' services; Applicability of penalties under various sections; Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending appeal.

Service Tax Demand for 'Erection, Commissioning, and Installation' Services:
The Commissioner demanded service tax of Rs. 37,57,740/- along with interest for services provided by the appellants related to 'erection, commissioning, and installation' during a specific period. The appellants argued that these services were part of works executed under 'works contract' for various projects, including rural electrification, household electrification, power supply augmentation, and building electrification. They highlighted their registration under the Karnataka VAT Act and previous assessments for VAT under 'works contract.' The appellants contended that since works contracts were taxed for the first time on 1-6-2007, the demand and penalties for the period ending 31-3-2007 were not sustainable. They also pointed out their registration as service providers under 'works contract,' emphasizing that the activity assessed under this category should not have been taxed for an earlier period under any other category.

Applicability of Penalties Under Various Sections:
The impugned order included penalties under different sections, notably an amount of Rs. 37,57,740/- under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellants sought a waiver of pre-deposit of the adjudged amounts and a stay on the recovery. The Counsel for the appellants argued that the penalties were not justified, considering the nature of the services provided and the timing of the introduction of works contracts into the tax net. The Tribunal considered the arguments and found that the appellants had made a prima facie case against the demand and penalties. It was noted that service tax could not be levied on activities newly brought under taxation without corresponding changes in existing categories. Consequently, the Tribunal ordered a complete waiver of pre-deposit of the dues and stayed the recovery pending the appeal decision.

Waiver of Pre-Deposit and Stay of Recovery Pending Appeal:
After careful consideration of the case records and submissions from both parties, the Tribunal concluded that the appellants had established a prima facie case against the demand and penalties imposed. Recognizing the principle that service tax could not be imposed on activities newly included in the tax net without appropriate adjustments in existing categories, the Tribunal granted a complete waiver of pre-deposit of the adjudged amounts and stayed the recovery pending the final decision in the appeal. This decision aimed to ensure fairness and justice during the appeal process, providing relief to the appellants while the matter was under review.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates