Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2009 (10) TMI 671

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2. A show cause cum demand notice dated 16-5-2008 was issued to the appellants under F. No. PREV/NTSSK/S.TAX/07/Part-I alleging that the appellants were engaged in providing taxable service under the category of Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency s Services to M/s. Nagar Taluka SSK Ltd. and received payments for the same from time to time. During the period from 17-11-2005 to 23-5-2007 the appellant had allegedly provided services for which they received an amount of Rs. 4,06,44,466/- on which amount of Service tax was worked out to Rs. 48,81,728/-. Therefore the appellants were issued show cause notice asking them as to why; (i) Service tax amounting to Rs. 48,81,728/- should not be demanded, confirmed and recovered from them in ter .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... any person only w.e.f. 1-5-2006. Prior to that the service of Manpower Recruitment Agency was applicable to the providers in the nature of commercial concern . They were not well conversant with the new levy and therefore there was lapse of non payment of Service tax took place. There was no mala fide intention to evade payment of Service tax. On realizing the mistake they accepted the tax liability w.e.f 1-5-06 and paid the amount of Service tax along with interest before issuance of show cause notice. 6. Personal hearing in the matter was held on 8-9-2009 which was attended to by Shri S.B. Awate, Consultant. He sought adjournment for next date. Personal Hearing was held on 26-10-09 which was again attended by Shri. S.B. Awate, Consult .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appellant themselves are engaging a work force through sub-contractors for carrying out the work of harvesting and transportation of sugar cane. For executing this assignment, the appellant is receiving payments from the sugar factory and is paying to the sub-contractors engaged by them. It means that the appellant is not supplier of the workers. The Service tax is chargeable on the activity of supply of labour or any activity in connection with supply of labour. 9. The general ledger of M/s. Nagar Taluka SSK Ltd. and of the appellant clearly shows that the payment on account of these activities were made to the appellants and not to the individual workers by the sugar factory. Had the workers been supplied to the sugar factory, the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates