2009 (5) TMI 837

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER Ld. Sr. Counsel Shri J.F. Pochkhanawala very fairly submits that the proposition of levy is not disputed. But the basis of levy is disputed for many reasons. But to reduce the litigation the appellant itself has come forward to make deposit of 80% of the demand in question. There is a total service tax demand of Rs. 133,23,63,360/-. Once 80% is deducted from .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X