9911796707
TMI Blog1969 (12) TMI 106X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... within the meaning of section 8(3)(a) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, as originally enacted. The case of the assessee was that a turnover of Rs. 1,86,848.44 related to sale of cotton seeds, which, according to him, was a declared commodity. This stand was taken by the assessee, at any rate, before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and reiterated in second appeal before the Sales Tax Appella ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rpose disclosed therein was to the effect that the goods were intended for use in the manufacture of goods for sale. The Tribunal noticed the categorical purpose as disclosed in the 'C' form declarations and came, in our opinion, to the correct conclusion and held that the concessional rate was not applicable and that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was wrong in having invoked such a concessi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... caping the levy, the goods were characterised as "declared goods" and as the sale in question was a second sale, a point was raised that no tax was leviable at all. In other words, the argument is that for the limited purpose of escaping the levy the goods were characterised as "declared goods" but for the purpose of section 8(3)(a) the goods are not "declared goods" and therefore section 8(3)(b) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... goods into goods other than "declared goods" and claim entitlement as to concession under section 8(3)(b) of the Act. Once it is irrefutable that the goods are "declared goods", as it is the case of the assessee himself, then section 8(3)(a) of the original enactment will operate and in the instant case the assessee would not be entitled to the concessional rate. This is a case where goods were p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
