Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1973 (5) TMI 86

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (2) Does rule 27A of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941, apply to a best judgment assessment?" In this case, it appears that as the dealer failed to produce books of account, etc., in respect of the assessment for the period from 1st July, 1957, to 16th July, 1957, and three quarters ended on Chaitra, 1364 B.S., under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, as per direction of a notice in form C issued by the Commercial Tax Officer, Manicktala Charge, he assessed the dealer on estimate to the best of his judgment by the order dated 12th June, 1967. The Commercial Tax Officer, Manicktala Charge, Calcutta, estimated the gross turnover at Rs. 3,00,000 against the dealer's estimated turnover of Rs. 2,68,816.24 according to the return submitted by the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e gross turnover at Rs. 3,00,000, but making no allowance for any claim for which no declaration or evidence had been produced before the Commercial Tax Officer as per law and as per rules. The Member, Board of Revenue, inter alia, observed as follows: ".............. Moreover, it is clear from the assessment order itself that this estimate of the gross turnover has not been made on pure guess or suspicion, but the Commercial Tax Officer has made the assessment after taking into account all available material and the basis of the estimate of the gross turnover has also been stated in the order itself. The estimate of Rs. 3,00,000 as the gross turnover, therefore, stands. However, I must reiterate, as I have held before, that without the dec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... evenue, West Bengal[1970] 26 S.T.C. 489. , and the observations of the court at page 501, this question must be answered in the affirmative and in favour of the respondent. Counsel for the petitioner, however, contended that the Board of Revenue and the Commissioner had, under section 20(3) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act read with section 9 of the Central Sales Tax Act, power to enhance suo motu but no power to enhance on an application for revision filed before him by a dealer. As mentioned hereinbefore, in view of the said decision, this contention cannot be accepted. It was then urged that this power could only be utilised in a manner which would give reasonable opportunity to the dealer. That is so indeed and sub-section (5) of s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... grievance of the petitioner is that while considering the propriety of a best judgment assessment, the Member, Board of Revenue, had erred in disallowing the benefit for non-supply of the declaration forms. It was submitted that in fact the Member, Board of Revenue, had acted on the basis of the principles of rule 27A of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1941. It appears to us that the Member, Board of Revenue, had proceeded to examine the propriety of the best judgment assessments made by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Best judgment assessment does not mean an arbitrary assessment. Even in a best judgment assessment the case of the assessee cannot be arbitrarily rejected or any tax due can be enhanced or any deduction cannot al .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates