9911796707
TMI Blog2010 (4) TMI 940X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... No. 197-CE/MRT-I/07 dated 30-10-2007. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The case has long background history. The respondents were purchasing tyre cord fabrics and the suppliers have paid duty under erstwhile Tariff Item 68 and the appellants have availed set-off of duty in terms of Notification No. 201/79. The Department felt that the classification of the said tyre cord fabrics should have been under ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f Hon ble Delhi High Court order dated 28-2-2002 passed in the matter of Civil Writ Petition No. 1371/81. I observe that in spite of issue of deficiency note dated 30-4-03, the party failed to submit requisite documents till date, inasmuch as despite passage of considerable time the original authority essential for verification of the refund claim were not produced and they submitted photocopy of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... supports the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). 6. I have carefully considered the submissions from both sides and perused the records. At the outset, it is to be noted that the refund claim has been processed in pursuance of the order of the Hon ble High Court of Delhi. The basis for the doubt expressed by the original authority that the respondents having paid the disputed amount vide TR-6 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the appellants were purchasing tyre cord fabric under TI 68 after payment of duty and were taking set off credit of the duty amount under Notification No. 201/79. They were also taking credit of duty paid on inputs used in nil duty paid tyre/tubes. The Department issued two show cause notices dated 16-2-81 and 10-3-81 where were set aside by the Hon ble Delhi High Court on 28-2-2002. Therefore, t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
