1984 (4) TMI 276

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 67. 2.. The statement of case has been duly submitted and the only question referred for our opinion is: "Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the period of limitation for the appeal against the order of assessment dated 28th February, 1969, should be counted from 24th June, 1969, the date on which the original demand notice was served o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... before the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, which were both dismissed on account of limitation. The dealer thereafter preferred revisions before the Tribunal and it upheld the decision of the Deputy Commissioner that the appeals were rightly held to be barred by limitation. 4.. In this case we are not concerned with the appeal in so far as the original order of assessment is concerned. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 970] 25 STC 114, Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar v. North Ramgarh Coal Company Private Ltd. [1974] 33 STC 469 and Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna v. Rameshwar Das Panna Lal [1974] 34 STC 296, without going into further detailed statements, as the point posed for our opinion is already covered by the cases cited above, apart from others. We, accordingly, answer the question i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X