Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1988 (11) TMI 341

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ner by the Directorate of Industries. The petitioner was also registered under the Factories Act. On the application of the petitioner, it was granted eligibility certificate on 9th November, 1984, for exemption from payment of sales tax for a period of five years with effect from 1st January, 1984, vide annexure 2. However, the petitioner was served with a notice dated 20th June, 1987 (annexure 3), to show cause why the period of exemption should not be reduced. Annexure 4 dated 1st July, 1987, is a copy of the petitioner's reply to the show cause pleading against the proposed reduction of the period of exemption. By order dated 10th September, 1987, the Additional Director of Industries, respondent No. 2 reduced the period of exemption fr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... exemption was rectified from five years to three years by order dated 10th September, 1987, under annexure 5. On a reference to Government Order dated 30th September, 1982, and the set of "niyamawali" made under it, it is seen that in paragraph 1 under the heading "prastavna " it is stated that those units which have been established between 1st October, 1982 and 31st May, 1985, and are either registered under the Factories Act or whose investment in land, building, machinery and equipment is more than rupees three lacs, would be entitled to exemption from payment of sales tax from the date of starting production. However, in paragraph 4(1) of the said "niyamawali" under the heading "paribashaen" small-scale industries are defined to be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 1 (SC); 1988 UPTC 20 (SC), it was held as follows: "It is not disputed that the first order, namely, the one dated April 11, 1979, gave more of tax exemption than the second one. The second notification withdrew the exemption relating to purchase tax and confined the exemption from sales tax to the limit specified in the proviso of the notification. All parties before us who in response to the order of April 11, 1979, set up their industries prior to October 21, 1980, within the State of Kerala would thus be entitled to the exemption extended and/or promised under that order. Such exemption would continue for the full period of five years from the date they started production. New industries set up after October 21, 1980, obviously would .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates