1989 (4) TMI 312

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... x due only at the rate of 9 per cent instead of the higher rate at which the interest was claimed by the department, was rejected. The Tribunal held that this contention of the assessee based on an order of the State Government granting that benefit did not have the force of law. It was pointed out at the hearing that the assessee subsequently made an application to the Commissioner, Commercial .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he present case is prepared to abide by this order of the Commissioner in respect of the period involved in this revision. This being so, it is not necessary to decide the legal effect of the State Government's orders dated 23rd June, 1976 and 27th September, 1976, which are the bases of the decision of the Tribunal. Consequently the assessee's revision is allowed and it is held that the assesse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X