9911796707
TMI Blog2010 (8) TMI 211X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... taying the order - suspending the licence of the petitioner - G.A. No. 2321 of 2010 and W.P. No. 87 of 2010 - - - Dated:- 6-8-2010 - Soumitra Pal, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri R.K. Chaudhuri, Advocate, for the Petitioner. S/Shri T.K. Hazra and K.K. Maity, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The Court : In this application, being G.A. No. 2321 of 2010 filed in connectio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... It was specifically recorded that the directions issued were peremptory. 3. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the applicant that though reply to the show cause notice was submitted within time, till date proceedings have not been concluded, as a result, the petitioner is suffering the order of suspension. Submission is that on 30th June, 2010, the respondent No. 2, has issued a n ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ings within a given time-frame and no interim order was passed with the expectation that the proceedings for revocation of licence would be completed within the said time-frame. However, it appears that proceedings have not been completed. Rather the respondent No. 2 has issued a corrigendum dated 30th June, 2010 to the notice to show cause modifying the show cause notice dated 24th February, 2010 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... proceedings concluded, in my view, a prima facie case has been made out for staying the order dated 13th January, 2010 suspending the licence of the petitioner. Therefore, let there be an order of injunction restraining the respondent nos. 1 and 2 from acting further so far as the order of suspension dated 13th January, 2010. The petitioner shall be at liberty to carry on the business as Customs ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
