2011 (1) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of cum-duty-price in terms of provisions of Section 4(4)(d) (ii) of Central Excise Act, 1944 - appellants cannot plead the matter again on merit when the issue stands finally decided by the earlier order and quantification done by the Commissioner, the correctness of which is not being disputed by the learned advocate – Appeal rejected - E/13/2010 - - - Dated:- 6-1-2011 - Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rly agree that the quantification done by the Commissioner vide his impugned order is in terms of direction of the Tribunal as contained in the earlier order. However, he submits that the earlier order of the Tribunal is not correct and makes efforts to re-argue the issue on merit. This stand strongly objected to by the learned SDR Shri J.S. Negi. 3. We fully agree with the learned SDR that the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X