9911796707
Advanced Search 
TMI Blog2011 (5) TMI 49X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e. Per: Archana Wadhwa: After hearing both sides duly represented by Shri G.L. Rawal, learned Sr.Advocate, appearing for the appellants and Shri I. Ahmed, learned SDR appearing for the Revenue, we find that the Commissioner(Appeals) has dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant on the ground of time bar. 2. It is seen that the appellants imported Crude Degummed Soya Bean ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l duty of Rs.45,99,006/- (Rupees Forty Five Lakhs, Ninety Nine Thousands and Six only) i.e. the duty finally assessed and duty paid provisionally within 7 days from the receipt of the said letter, otherwise, Bank Guarantee furnished by the appellant will be encashed. Thereafter, the appellants wrote a letter to the Superintendent on 15.12.05 seeking details of finalisation of Bill of Entry as the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssed by Superintendent to the appellant. As per the said letter, there is a direction to the appellant to pay the differential amount in terms of finally assessed Bill of Entry and the provisionally assessed Bill of Entry. In fact, this letter can be safely considered to be a letter of recovery and the demand as a consequence of finalization of Bill of Entry. By no stretch of imagination, the said ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n appealable order. The minimum obligation on the part of the Revenue was that to supply a copy of the said Bill of Entry to the appellant, so as to enable them to challenge the same before higher appellate forum. Ld.SDR appearing for the Revenue fairly concedes that there is no evidence on record to show that copy of the Bill of Entry was handed over to the appellant before 16.12.05. He submits t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
