9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (1) TMI 313X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed single Judge, as a period in regard to which sufficient cause was made out for condoning the delay, while considering the question of delay, in filing the writ appeal - Of course, the position would be different if the Division Bench had found that filing of the review petition was not for bona fide reasons or there were other reasons to suspect the bona fides of the appellant - Delay is condon ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dated 8-4-2009 of the learned single Judge. A Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the writ appeal on the ground of delay of 342 days in filing the writ appeal. 3. The appellants contended that the review petition filed by them in respect of the learned single Judge's order dated 8-4-2009, was disposed of only on 9-4-2010 and therefore the period spent till 9-4-2010 ought to have ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... appeal. That is because the learned single Judge was dealing with delay in filing the review petition, whereas the Division Bench was dealing in filing the writ appeal. Nevertheless, if the delay of 305 days in filing the review petition had been condoned by the learned single Judge, as having been satisfactorily explained and thereafter the review petition had been dismissed without prejudice to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
