2011 (6) TMI 80

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... thout insisting for any further deposit. - E/632/2010 - - - Dated:- 7-6-2011 - Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Dr. P. Babu, JJ. For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Patki, Adv. for Assessee. For Respondent: Shri I. Ahmed, SDR for the Revenue. Per: Archana Wadhwa: Out of the total duty of Rs.11,59,698/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs, Fifty Nine Thousands, Six Hundreds and Ninety Eight only) confirmed .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... de by the appellant is sufficient for the purposes of Section 35F, there is no justification asking for further deposit as directed by Commissioner (Appeals). We, accordingly, set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to Commissioner(Appeals), for decision on merit without insisting for any further deposit. 4. Stay petition as also appeal gets disposed off in above manner. (Dictat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X