2010 (7) TMI 697

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ppellants that the impugned activity came within the definition of ‘input service’ as per Rule 2(l)(ii), as “activities relating to business - Decided in favor of the assessee
S/Shri M.V. Ravindran, P. Karthikeyan, JJ. REPRESENTED BY :Shri G. Natarajan, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri M.M. Ravi Rajendran, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P. Karthikeyan, Member (T)]. - The impugned o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X