9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (7) TMI 353X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f 24 months - It is only ultimately the the Superintendent vide letter dt.29.12.08 (received by the appellant on 12.01.09), that a copy of the order was supplied to them - However, the ld. Advocate submits that in terms of said order, it seems that the order was pasted in their factory, which was closed - find that without considering factual position, the Commissioner(Appeals) has simply dismisse ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Four Hundreds and Eighty Six Only) have already been deposited by them during the course of investigation. They had deposited the balance amount now. As such, I find that there is a compliance of the Stay Order. 2. As regards appeals, it is seen that the appeal of M/s Miltex Laminates and Shri Anant Shah stand rejected by the Commissioner(Appeals) on the point of limitation. Only the appeal of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e appellant under RTI Act, making submission to the effect that the appeal filed by the Revenue does not stand received by them. In their subsequent letter, dt.22.05.08 to the Commissioner(Appeals), they have again submitted that they have neither received the EA-2 application filed by the department nor they have received the order impugned. As such, request was made to Commissioner(Appeals) to s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2.01.09), that a copy of the order was supplied to them. However, the ld. Advocate submits that in terms of said order, it seems that the order was pasted in their factory, which was closed. In this scenario, submits the ld. Advocate that there is no delay in filing the appeal inasmuch as the same was filed within 2 months from the date of receipt of the order. 4. After hearing the ld. SDR, I ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
