2011 (7) TMI 496

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tioner. Shri Sujan N. Kantawala and Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocates, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Our attention has been drawn to the contents of paragraph 5 of the impugned judgment and order [2010 (253) E.L.T. 387 (Bom.)] wherein the High Court has recorded that a consensus was there between the counsel appearing for the parties at .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t seeking for a review of the aforesaid contents in paragraph 5. 5. We permit the petitioners to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file a review petition before the High Court within a period of three weeks. If the same is filed accordingly, the High Court will entertain such petition without raising any objection with regard to the period of limitation and shall hear the petition on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X