TMI Blog2011 (6) TMI 377X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the decision of CCE, Chandigarh Vs. M/s Team S&S [2010 (11) TMI 69 - CESTAT, New Delhi] - Held that:- Appellate Authority has not intended to impose tax on the reimbursable expenses as a result of which service tax of Rs. 1,40,000/- was annulled - Therefore, first Appellate order is reversed and Adjudication order is restored - Revenue's Appeal is allowed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al remarks does not call for granting further opportunity to the Respondent. Therefore, we dispose this appeal on the basis of the merits. We have gone through the Appellate order under challenge by Revenue. We agree with the submissions of the ld. DR that the Appellate Authority has not intended to impose tax on the reimbursable expenses as a result of which service tax of Rs. 1,40,000/- was annu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|