TMI Blog2011 (10) TMI 331X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nvat Credit Rules, 2004. See CCE, Chandigarh-II vs. M/s.Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd (2011 - TMI - 206654 - Punjab And Haryana High Court) – Decided against the Revenue. - E/2207 of 2009-SM - - - Dated:- 31-10-2011 - Ms. Archana Wadhwa, J. Appearance: Shri Fateh Singh, DR for the Appellants Shri Ramesh Nair Shri Manish Saharan, Advocate for the Respondent Per Archa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... used by learned SDR and insisted to be incorporated in the order). 3. After hearing the learned Advocate for the respondents, I find that the issue is no more res integra and stands covered by the decision of the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of M/s. Federal Mogul Goetze (India) Ltd. [2011-TIOL-650-HC-P H-ST]. The arguments of learned DR cannot be appreciated inasmuch as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|