9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (7) TMI 875X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , SDR) Per: P.G. Chacko 1. Vide Order No. S/293-294/2011/EB/C-II dated 14.4.2011, this Bench had directed the main appellant (Vinar Ispat Ltd) to pre-deposit an amount of Rs 11.52 lakhs towards duty within a period of eight weeks and to report compliance on 11.7.2011. In that order, it was also laid down that, in the event of due compliance, there shall be waiver of pre-deposit and stay of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to consider their stay application. It is submitted that the stay application filed with the High Court stands listed alongwith the main appeal for admission on 25.7.2011. The prayer of the advocate is that the present case be adjourned to some date after 25.7.2011. The counsel has also invited our attention to the Hon'ble Court's order in Jaiprakash Strips Ltd vs Union of India 2009 (24) E ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t reasonable time to enable the petitioner to produce an order from this court, and on failure to do so proceed with the matter. Ultimately, the Tribunal is subject to the supervisory jurisdiction of this court." The learned counsel relying on the above order of the Hon'ble High Court prays that a further adjournment be granted for report of compliance and that this Bench refrain from dismissing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ached the Hon'ble High Court much earlier than the date on which they actually moved the High Court.Further, when the matter arose before the Bench for report of compliance on 11.7.2011, the counsel's submission regarding pendency of their appeal and stay petition before the Hon'ble High Court was favourably considered by this Bench and a reasonable time was given to enable them to make the pre-de ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
