2011 (6) TMI 580

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ir appeal for non-compliance with the provisions of Section 35F of the Act – Held that:- order is not on merit but the appeal has been dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) for non-compliance of the stay order. appellants have made a pre-deposit of 50% of duty and the same is sufficient in compliance with the Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. matter remanded to the Commissioner (Appea .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f confirmation of duty demand, interest and penalty on them. While dealing the stay application of the appellants, the Commissioner (Appeals) directed them to make a pre-deposit of 50% of duty and 50% of penalty vide order dated 20/07/2009 within 10 days of the receipt of the order. 3. The appellants paid 50% of duty demanded, but they did not inform the Commissioner (Appeals) whether they have .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X