2011 (9) TMI 814

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... A – Department decided demand upto the period March 2008 is time barred. Service tax demand for the period 4/2008 to 3/2009 – Demand is payable – Directed to pay amount – Subject to the payment waiver be made in respect pre-deposit dues. - ST/2617, 2618/2010 - 834 & 835/2011 - Dated:- 20-9-2011 - P G Chacko, M Veeraiyan, JJ. For Appellant: Mr S Jaikumar, Adv. For Respondent: Mr R K .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e entire facts were before the Department and therefore extended period of limitation should not have been invoked. 3.2. In respect of demand relating to the period 4/2008 to 3/2009, he fairly submits that the entire demand is within the normal period of limitation but adds that the authorities have failed to give cum-tax benefit. 3.3. He further submits that they have voluntarily paid a sum o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X